Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBrodlie, Ken W.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGöbel, Martinen_US
dc.contributor.authorRoberts, Annen_US
dc.contributor.authorZiegler, Rolfen_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-10-05T07:56:10Z
dc.date.available2015-10-05T07:56:10Z
dc.date.issued1989en_US
dc.identifier.issn1017-4656en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.2312/egtp.19891032en_US
dc.description.abstractConformance testing of graphics systems is a very complex and exhausting task. Years of practice with the GKS testing tools have shown a need for the automatic testing of visual output. Indeed, with regard to graphics systems which are more precisely specified than GKS like the Computer Graphics Interface (CGI), conformance testing is not manageable at all unless a major part can be automated. This paper discusses different strategies for the automatic testing of pictorial effect. It concentrates on the definition of lines and describes a strategy to answer the question put in the title by the testing system. Finally, automatic testing of simple graphical operations such as segment highlighting and visibility is discussed.en_US
dc.publisherEurographics Associationen_US
dc.titleWhen is a Line a Line?en_US
dc.description.seriesinformationEG 1989-Technical Papersen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.2312/egtp.19891032en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record