dc.contributor.author | Clay, Arthur | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Trumpy, Giorgio | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Weinmann, Michael | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Wetzel, Richard | en_US |
dc.contributor.editor | Bucciero, Alberto | en_US |
dc.contributor.editor | Fanini, Bruno | en_US |
dc.contributor.editor | Graf, Holger | en_US |
dc.contributor.editor | Pescarin, Sofia | en_US |
dc.contributor.editor | Rizvic, Selma | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-09-02T07:44:45Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-09-02T07:44:45Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | |
dc.identifier.isbn | 978-3-03868-217-2 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2312-6124 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.2312/gch.20231178 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://diglib.eg.org:443/handle/10.2312/gch20231178 | |
dc.description.abstract | To enable a richer presentation of cultural heritage and its needs, a shift in how artworks are exhibited is necessary. This paper explores two case studies that highlight the significant role of reproductions in showcasing restoration processes and associated technologies. This approach raises awareness about concepts of care and authenticity and their impact. It goes beyond merely displaying restored digital images that fail to capture the true state of the artworks or the artist's original intent. To achieve this, we propose employing glass layers or lenticular print technology, allowing a restored version of the artwork's original state while maintaining the ability to view the original artwork and restoration process separately. | en_US |
dc.publisher | The Eurographics Association | en_US |
dc.rights | Attribution 4.0 International License | |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | |
dc.title | Prototyping Care: Two Case Studies | en_US |
dc.description.seriesinformation | Eurographics Workshop on Graphics and Cultural Heritage | |
dc.description.sectionheaders | Posters and Demos | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.2312/gch.20231178 | |
dc.identifier.pages | 189-190 | |
dc.identifier.pages | 2 pages | |